Hi, I've just finished reading the article "Reality Bits" in the
January 25-31, 2014 edition of New Scientist.
These links are introductions for those of you who do not read
New Scientist:
http://ift.tt/1fRalTE
http://ift.tt/1fRalTG
http://ift.tt/OzdbqJ
Can anybody explain what Dr. Wootters is talking about?
I don't think he is reformulating QM with the mere substitution
of sqrt(-1) for its matrix identity since that would only yield a
notationally equivalent and trivial reformulation and the math
would not change.
But instead, I think Dr. Wooters has a new approach to
avoiding imaginary numbers in QM.
At this point I don't have a clue what Dr. Wooters is proposing
and any incite would be greately appreciated.
EDIT: and some insights would be appreciated too.
January 25-31, 2014 edition of New Scientist.
These links are introductions for those of you who do not read
New Scientist:
http://ift.tt/1fRalTE
http://ift.tt/1fRalTG
http://ift.tt/OzdbqJ
Can anybody explain what Dr. Wootters is talking about?
I don't think he is reformulating QM with the mere substitution
of sqrt(-1) for its matrix identity since that would only yield a
notationally equivalent and trivial reformulation and the math
would not change.
But instead, I think Dr. Wooters has a new approach to
avoiding imaginary numbers in QM.
At this point I don't have a clue what Dr. Wooters is proposing
and any incite would be greately appreciated.
EDIT: and some insights would be appreciated too.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire