Is it possible to answer a fundamental question about the nature of our universe with fourth grade math?
You be the judge.
Required: the natural numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc) plus your patience to let me explain the next steps.
In the end, I will deliver the (to some the rather unimportant) information that humans think both in natural and in artificial ways to understand our environment. And when we don't make the distinction clear, we can easily get confused about the ToE. Simple math helps bring the point home and tells us something important about the universe.
When the natural numbers are set in rows of six numbers (six packs) as shown below, specific stepping patterns are found that themselves have an overall pattern that points undeniably to an instance of required use of number zero. Number theorists mention that in the definition of the natural numbers zero is not part and parcel. Set theorists on the other hand state that zero is a natural number. The following evidence should convince you that number theorists acknowledge an artificial definition, while set theorists follow the natural definition. I am personally fine with our having both definitions. But it also tells us how humans can miss a vital aspect important to understanding the ToE when we don't distinguish between artificial definitions and natural definitions.
Here we go:
01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36
37 38 39 40 41 42
43 44 45 46 47 48
49 50 51 52 53 54
55 56 57 58 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66
67 68 69 70 71 72
73 74 75 76 77 78
79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90
91 92 93 94 95 96
etc.
All the patterns discussed here are found with the number 1-and-5 locations in these six packs of numbers. I am providing you an insight using just these numbers till number 96, but these six-pack patterns work for the much larger numbers just the same.
As you can see, some numbers are highlighted in red and some in green, and starting at their squares they are multiplications of 5 (shown in red) and of 7 (underlined and in green).
The multiplications of 5 in red show a stepping pattern among the six-packs of first a step that is 1 row below (which includes a jump to the right for example with the step from 25 to 35). Then, next, a step is found of 4 rows below (including a jump back to the left, as with going from 35 to 55). I am only providing a few numbers, but you should be able to pick out the pattern in red of 1 and 4 jumps of six-pack rows as found here with 25, 35, 55, 65, 85, and 95. The multiplications for number 5 repeat in this 1 + 4 pattern, and will do so forever. I could have made 05 red as well, and this would be consistent with the pattern, but I am expressing the pattern for all these numbers starting at their square. For 5 that is 25, for 7 that is 49.
Number 7 colors its multiplications green in a stepping pattern of 4 rows below and then 3 rows below (again, starting at its square). Visually, only the first few jumps are shown with 49, 77, and 91, and this pattern continues forever. For 7 the pattern is 4 + 3 jumps of six-pack rows. I could have made 07 and 35 green as well, and be consistent pattern-wise, but again I am expressing the stepping patterns starting at each number's square. So, that's 49 for number 7.
Number 11 is the next number (its pattern starts at its square of 121, so not shown here). If you want you can already recognize the pattern when starting at 11. The next is 8 rows below at 55, and the following one is 3 rows below at 77. The stepping pattern for 11 is 8 + 3.
The next number is 13 (starting at 169), the next ones are 17, 19, 23 etc. Please note that these numbers (1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 25, 29, etc) are all the numbers in 1-and-5 locations of six packs.
The interesting part is that these stepping patterns are linked. So, there is an overall connection among them, and it is in this overall pattern that we encounter undeniably an instance of having to use zero (which is explained right after). Here is the pattern, starting with 5.
5 (1 + 4)
7 (4 + 3)
11 (3 + 8 )
13 (8 + 5)
17 (5 + 12)
19 (12 + 7)
23 (7 + 16)
25 (16 + 9)
etc.
Each stepping pattern is linked: the latter part of one stepping pattern is repeated as the former of the next one. For instance, the 8 in the pattern of 11 (3 + 8 ) is also found with the pattern for the next number 13 (8 + 5). And you can see how the 5 in the stepping pattern for 13 is found again in the stepping pattern for 17, while the 12 of this pattern is found again with the stepping pattern for 19.
Maybe not you, but I get quite excited about this, so let me tell you once more that all the jump patterns for these 1-and-5 numbers are linked in one overall pattern, showing exactly and predictably what specific jump numbers are found in these six-packs. Again, only shown here are the very beginnings of patterns for numbers 5 and 7. Reason: the patterns get huge rather quickly.
Now, as the last part to understand, going backwards and reviewing the pattern for 1 as the first number in 1-and-5 places in the six packs, we can establish a pattern of (0 + 1). Get this: The jump of 1 is common for both natural number 1 (as found with the latter in 0 + 1) and natural number 5 (as the former in 1 + 4). The correct and complete beginning of the overall pattern is therefore:
1 (0 + 1)
5 (1 + 4)
7 (4 + 3)
11 (3 + 8 )
13 (8 + 5)
17 (5 + 12)
19 (12 + 7)
etc.
Starting at its square (and we know this is also 1), the pattern of natural number 1 jumps zero lines while moving to the right. Next, it jumps one line of six-packs while moving back to the left position. Basically, this stepping pattern hits all 1-and-5 locations in these six packs.
This is what is shown here: We hád to use zero to explain a step in a stepping pattern found within the natural numbers. For number 1, a pause and a jump of one row is its stepping pattern. The pause is expressed with number zero. The pause of jumping a row still requires a move to the right side, and that's how we get to see the action.
We had to use zero, and zero can therefore not be seen as anything other than part and parcel of all these numbers. Whether or not to change the definitions of the natural numbers for number theorists is not an essential question, but what is important is that this information clearly declares that number theorists are using an artificial definition (in which zero is not considered a natural number), while set theorists are using a natural definition (in which zero is considered a natural number).
At this point I must warn you about understanding the ToE with this information. Please do not consider the idea that matter came forth out of nothing, but see this information for what it is. Don't fall into the rabbit hole! When looking for overall deliveries, zero is part and parcel of the delivery. Said differently: When we are looking at specific situations, zero may still be seen as totally unimportant. This is one reason artificial definitions can still be handy.
However, if we want to understand the bigger picture the whole picture, and nothing but the entire picture, then we must accept that zero, the pause, the place holder, the emptiness is important. Let me explain the importance of emptiness with finance in mind: The fact that nobody wants their wallet to be empty is a tremendously important fact in finance. Still, many economists forget the reality of empty wallets and rather focus on investments and their outcomes (they forget that investing cannot be done with an empty wallet and they assume the investment will be made — by someone with money).
With this information obtained from the natural numbers and the natural numbers only, do you agree that in the bigger picture zero is automatically there?
Why is this important for the ToE? The mathematical information shows that our universe is a result only.
Many scientists claim our universe came forth out of nothing. But this mathematical information shows that nothing is actually part and parcel of the overall package, and instead of the universe coming forth out of nothing, we need an actual nothing as the first step of our universe. Zero exists therefore on the inside of our universe. I make no claim about what came before, but the conclusion I make is that our universe is a universe of result only.
Interestingly, modern physics also states just that: Matter is only about 4% of all energy in our universe. The zero of matter may be as much as 96% of what we suspect should be there. There is a reality to zero and it plays an important role in creating our material everything.
Is it possible to answer a fundamental question about the nature of our universe with fourth grade math?
You be the judge.
You be the judge.
Required: the natural numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, etc) plus your patience to let me explain the next steps.
In the end, I will deliver the (to some the rather unimportant) information that humans think both in natural and in artificial ways to understand our environment. And when we don't make the distinction clear, we can easily get confused about the ToE. Simple math helps bring the point home and tells us something important about the universe.
When the natural numbers are set in rows of six numbers (six packs) as shown below, specific stepping patterns are found that themselves have an overall pattern that points undeniably to an instance of required use of number zero. Number theorists mention that in the definition of the natural numbers zero is not part and parcel. Set theorists on the other hand state that zero is a natural number. The following evidence should convince you that number theorists acknowledge an artificial definition, while set theorists follow the natural definition. I am personally fine with our having both definitions. But it also tells us how humans can miss a vital aspect important to understanding the ToE when we don't distinguish between artificial definitions and natural definitions.
Here we go:
01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36
37 38 39 40 41 42
43 44 45 46 47 48
49 50 51 52 53 54
55 56 57 58 59 60
61 62 63 64 65 66
67 68 69 70 71 72
73 74 75 76 77 78
79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90
91 92 93 94 95 96
etc.
All the patterns discussed here are found with the number 1-and-5 locations in these six packs of numbers. I am providing you an insight using just these numbers till number 96, but these six-pack patterns work for the much larger numbers just the same.
As you can see, some numbers are highlighted in red and some in green, and starting at their squares they are multiplications of 5 (shown in red) and of 7 (underlined and in green).
The multiplications of 5 in red show a stepping pattern among the six-packs of first a step that is 1 row below (which includes a jump to the right for example with the step from 25 to 35). Then, next, a step is found of 4 rows below (including a jump back to the left, as with going from 35 to 55). I am only providing a few numbers, but you should be able to pick out the pattern in red of 1 and 4 jumps of six-pack rows as found here with 25, 35, 55, 65, 85, and 95. The multiplications for number 5 repeat in this 1 + 4 pattern, and will do so forever. I could have made 05 red as well, and this would be consistent with the pattern, but I am expressing the pattern for all these numbers starting at their square. For 5 that is 25, for 7 that is 49.
Number 7 colors its multiplications green in a stepping pattern of 4 rows below and then 3 rows below (again, starting at its square). Visually, only the first few jumps are shown with 49, 77, and 91, and this pattern continues forever. For 7 the pattern is 4 + 3 jumps of six-pack rows. I could have made 07 and 35 green as well, and be consistent pattern-wise, but again I am expressing the stepping patterns starting at each number's square. So, that's 49 for number 7.
Number 11 is the next number (its pattern starts at its square of 121, so not shown here). If you want you can already recognize the pattern when starting at 11. The next is 8 rows below at 55, and the following one is 3 rows below at 77. The stepping pattern for 11 is 8 + 3.
The next number is 13 (starting at 169), the next ones are 17, 19, 23 etc. Please note that these numbers (1, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 25, 29, etc) are all the numbers in 1-and-5 locations of six packs.
The interesting part is that these stepping patterns are linked. So, there is an overall connection among them, and it is in this overall pattern that we encounter undeniably an instance of having to use zero (which is explained right after). Here is the pattern, starting with 5.
5 (1 + 4)
7 (4 + 3)
11 (3 + 8 )
13 (8 + 5)
17 (5 + 12)
19 (12 + 7)
23 (7 + 16)
25 (16 + 9)
etc.
Each stepping pattern is linked: the latter part of one stepping pattern is repeated as the former of the next one. For instance, the 8 in the pattern of 11 (3 + 8 ) is also found with the pattern for the next number 13 (8 + 5). And you can see how the 5 in the stepping pattern for 13 is found again in the stepping pattern for 17, while the 12 of this pattern is found again with the stepping pattern for 19.
Maybe not you, but I get quite excited about this, so let me tell you once more that all the jump patterns for these 1-and-5 numbers are linked in one overall pattern, showing exactly and predictably what specific jump numbers are found in these six-packs. Again, only shown here are the very beginnings of patterns for numbers 5 and 7. Reason: the patterns get huge rather quickly.
Now, as the last part to understand, going backwards and reviewing the pattern for 1 as the first number in 1-and-5 places in the six packs, we can establish a pattern of (0 + 1). Get this: The jump of 1 is common for both natural number 1 (as found with the latter in 0 + 1) and natural number 5 (as the former in 1 + 4). The correct and complete beginning of the overall pattern is therefore:
1 (0 + 1)
5 (1 + 4)
7 (4 + 3)
11 (3 + 8 )
13 (8 + 5)
17 (5 + 12)
19 (12 + 7)
etc.
Starting at its square (and we know this is also 1), the pattern of natural number 1 jumps zero lines while moving to the right. Next, it jumps one line of six-packs while moving back to the left position. Basically, this stepping pattern hits all 1-and-5 locations in these six packs.
This is what is shown here: We hád to use zero to explain a step in a stepping pattern found within the natural numbers. For number 1, a pause and a jump of one row is its stepping pattern. The pause is expressed with number zero. The pause of jumping a row still requires a move to the right side, and that's how we get to see the action.
We had to use zero, and zero can therefore not be seen as anything other than part and parcel of all these numbers. Whether or not to change the definitions of the natural numbers for number theorists is not an essential question, but what is important is that this information clearly declares that number theorists are using an artificial definition (in which zero is not considered a natural number), while set theorists are using a natural definition (in which zero is considered a natural number).
At this point I must warn you about understanding the ToE with this information. Please do not consider the idea that matter came forth out of nothing, but see this information for what it is. Don't fall into the rabbit hole! When looking for overall deliveries, zero is part and parcel of the delivery. Said differently: When we are looking at specific situations, zero may still be seen as totally unimportant. This is one reason artificial definitions can still be handy.
However, if we want to understand the bigger picture the whole picture, and nothing but the entire picture, then we must accept that zero, the pause, the place holder, the emptiness is important. Let me explain the importance of emptiness with finance in mind: The fact that nobody wants their wallet to be empty is a tremendously important fact in finance. Still, many economists forget the reality of empty wallets and rather focus on investments and their outcomes (they forget that investing cannot be done with an empty wallet and they assume the investment will be made — by someone with money).
With this information obtained from the natural numbers and the natural numbers only, do you agree that in the bigger picture zero is automatically there?
Why is this important for the ToE? The mathematical information shows that our universe is a result only.
Many scientists claim our universe came forth out of nothing. But this mathematical information shows that nothing is actually part and parcel of the overall package, and instead of the universe coming forth out of nothing, we need an actual nothing as the first step of our universe. Zero exists therefore on the inside of our universe. I make no claim about what came before, but the conclusion I make is that our universe is a universe of result only.
Interestingly, modern physics also states just that: Matter is only about 4% of all energy in our universe. The zero of matter may be as much as 96% of what we suspect should be there. There is a reality to zero and it plays an important role in creating our material everything.
Is it possible to answer a fundamental question about the nature of our universe with fourth grade math?
You be the judge.
via Physics Forums RSS Feed http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=720677&goto=newpost
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire