1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data I am learning special relativity and we came across the invariant quantity s = x2 - (ct)2. Our professor wants us to prove it. I admit that this is a proof and belongs in the mathematics section but I didn't see an Algebra section and this is most easily identified by those learning special relativity.
The assignment simply states
"Prove s2 = s'2"
2. Relevant equations
s2= x2-(ct)2
[itex]\gamma[/itex]=[1-([itex]\frac{v}{c}[/itex])2]-1/2
x' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt)
t' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2)
3. The attempt at a solution
My textbook is telling me in one sentence that if we apply the lorentz transformation to x and t then s2 = s'2.....so I did that...
I choose to start with s'2 = x'2-(ct')2
Applying the lorentz transformation to x' and t' our equation becomes...
s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt))2-(c([itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2))2
Expanding what we have takes us to...
s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex]2(x2-2vt+(vt)2)-(c2[itex]\gamma[/itex]2(t2)-2(v/c2)x+(v2/c4)x2))
If I combine some terms...
s'2 = [itex]\gamma[/itex]2[x2(1-(v2/c4)+t2(v-1)+2v((x/c2)-t)]
From here I tried a couple of different things on scratch paper but I couldn't see particular direction that would simplify it all down. Am I just not being patient enough and not seeing that it gets worse before it gets better?
Thanks in advance.
The assignment simply states
"Prove s2 = s'2"
2. Relevant equations
s2= x2-(ct)2
[itex]\gamma[/itex]=[1-([itex]\frac{v}{c}[/itex])2]-1/2
x' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt)
t' = [itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2)
3. The attempt at a solution
My textbook is telling me in one sentence that if we apply the lorentz transformation to x and t then s2 = s'2.....so I did that...
I choose to start with s'2 = x'2-(ct')2
Applying the lorentz transformation to x' and t' our equation becomes...
s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex](x-vt))2-(c([itex]\gamma[/itex](t-(vx/c2))2
Expanding what we have takes us to...
s'2 = ([itex]\gamma[/itex]2(x2-2vt+(vt)2)-(c2[itex]\gamma[/itex]2(t2)-2(v/c2)x+(v2/c4)x2))
If I combine some terms...
s'2 = [itex]\gamma[/itex]2[x2(1-(v2/c4)+t2(v-1)+2v((x/c2)-t)]
From here I tried a couple of different things on scratch paper but I couldn't see particular direction that would simplify it all down. Am I just not being patient enough and not seeing that it gets worse before it gets better?
Thanks in advance.
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire